Plea Bargains and Mandatory Sentencing Essay -- essays research papers

Plea Bargains and Mandatory Sentencing I would like to take this time to explain my position on Plea Bargains and Mandatory Sentencing. I will show both pros and cons for each topic, as well as give you my personal brief on which mavin I support. There are two types of plea bargains The first one is a charge bargain. When the prosecutor allows a defendant to "plead guilty to a lesser charge, or to unless some of the charges that have been filed against him. For example, a defendant charged with burglary may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to " essay burglary". A defendant charged with Drunk Driving and Driving with License Suspended may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to just the sot driving charge. The second plea bargain is when a defendant is told in advance what his sentence will be if he pleads guilty. This can help a prosecutor run a conviction if, for example, a defendant is facing serious charges and is afraid of being hit with the &quo tmaximum" sentence. Typically, sentence bargains can only be granted if they are approved by the trial judge. Many jurisdictions severely limit sentence bargaining.Sentence bargaining sometimes occurs in richly profile cases where the prosecutor does not want to reduce the charges against the defendant, usually for fear of how the newspapers will react. A sentence bargain may allow the prosecutor to obtain a conviction to the most serious charge, while assuring the defendant of an a...